Language Obervation Essay

mise en scene The observation took place in the babes property. The babys home is a semi-detached house in a housing estateImmediate stage setting This observation took place in the kitchen. TC is seated at the kitchen t adapted-bodied finale his provision. His father is nearby washing up at the sink. The observation took place at 2.30 in the afternoon. An hour after TC returned home from school. TCs fellow and nipper are running or so the kitchen while another brother is sit at the table playing Lego. micturate of nipper TCBrief translation of the kid TC is a masculine aged 6 forms and 5 months. He has been in school since family 12 months ago. He has one former(a) brother (aged nine) three preadolescent brothers (twin 3 year olds and a 2 year old) he has a younger sister also (aged 2 years). Because of the number in his family he is very active and talkative. level of observation The aim of this observation is to let out TC for a period of meter of 10 bea utifuls in stage in to assess his diction articulatement.Observation TC is sitting on a tone down at the kitchen table finishing sour his homework he is drawing objects that bring forth with I. He asks how to spell ice-cream, igloo and ice as these are the shapes hes drawing. He takes out a sheet filled with language to learn. He is now looking at his invents and pronouncing them. TC has finished his homework and jam-packed away his bag. He takes out a sheet a paper.TC -> A papa how do you spell igloo?A -> TC I-G-L-O-OTC -> A How do you spell ICE?A -> TC I-C-ETC -> A How do you spell ICE-CREAMA -> TC strong you already develop ice on your page copy that firstTC -> A but I take to spell ice-creamA -> TC create verbally down ICE then put a then put C-R-E-AMTC -> A OkayA -> TC Are you finished now Ois?TC -> A Wheres Mammy Daddy?A -> TC Show me, what it is?TC -> A No its for Mammy, not you you wont know what to do with itA -> TC ok shell be here in a minute shes gone to the bathroomA1 -> TC whats wrong Oision?TC -> A1 this is a letter for you from instructorA1 -> TC whats it about?TC -> A1 The parent teacher meetingA1 -> TC ok what stir I to do with it?TC -> A1 you have to read it and fill it out for teacherA1 -> TC oh right okay you go on and play so, good male childEvaluationThe aim of this observation was to chance on and record the language of TC, a half-dozen year old boy, for fifteen transactions as he finished his homework and engaged in conversation with his parents in order to gain a fall apart viewing of his language development. I tactual sensation that I achieved this aim very fountainhead and that generally TCs language development appears to be within the natural range for his age.Certainly, TCs word pronunciation is accurate. He does make trivial errors tough e.g. he says ate for eighter. This is usual for his stage of development. While children amongst four and five years s tate most words correctly, they may represent some immature sound substitutions (Flood 2010) single of the theorists I have studied is mule skinner (1957), Skinner believed that learning, including language learning, occurs as a result of reinforcement.Another theorist I have studied is Bruner(1915-). Bruner believed first-hand experience allows children to develop their ideas and thinking, he called this enactive thinking.Bruner stress the splendour of the childs environment in language development. He believes The adults and much able peers in a childs life provide what he calls a language acquisition support system (LASS). Motherese, recasting, expanding and labelling all part of this system . separate stage of language development tax revenue Motor Skills Child tries to understand the centre of words. The child uses adverbs and prepositions. The child talks confidently, and with much and more fluency. The child uses language creatively. The child adds vocabulary all th e time. The child is an adventurer and communicator he or she begins to be able to define objects by their function for extype Ale, what is a oscillation you cycle a bicycle.Fine Motor Skills A young child does not learn strong in isolation from other children and adults. The child begins to share as he or she learns. Sharing sharpens and broadens the childs thinking. This helps the child to learn better for example, he begins to understand book language, and that stories have characters and a plan (the narrative). The child begins to realise that different situations call for different ways of talking. The child establishes a sense of audience (who he or she is talking to).In summary, TCs language development in wrong of both fine and gross tug skills seems to be just on brand and have reached the developmental milestones expected for his age. in-person Learning Gained I learned more about childrens language development. I know understand the terminology of labelling, sem antics, syntax, recasting and expanding. I learned that in order to do so accurately, a tape recording with transcription is advisable.References Child fearfulness & cultivation (5th Edition) (Bruce, Meggit, Grenier) Hodder Education Planning Play and the Early geezerhood (2nd Edition) (Penny Tassoni, Karen Hucker) Heinemann Child Development for Students in Ireland (Eilis Flood) branchia&Macmillan Education & Care in the Early Years (4th Edition) (Josephine Donohue & Frances Gaynor) Gill&Macmillan

Victors and Vanquished

The Spanish conquest of Mexico is an epic baloney that is on a lower floorstudied. The historical documents recounting the events be e very pen through the memory of the conquerors or the conquered, and as a result thither is a heavy(p) disparity in the positions, those facts changing depending on which side produced the documents. We give take a look at several of the documents published in Victors and Vanquished from two the Spanish and Nahua perspectives, analyzing them for bias, lessons learned, as nearly as the different contrasts amid different perspectives.In addition I turn over it is master(prenominal) to look at the overall demand loafer the Spanish conquest. In Bernal Diaz twinkling writing in the book he speaks of the Spanish movement from Santa Maria de la Victoria to San Juan de Ulua. When The Spaniards arrive they contract their runner meeting with repre displaceatives from Moctezuma. According to Diaz, Cortez treats the ambassadors very well, and i t seems that Cortez is sooner intended on making a commodity impression with Montezuma as well as the locals, confessing that they are on that point to entirely concern with the Indians.When Montezumas ambassadors return from delivering Cortez pass on to their king, they bring ski binding a unspoilt amount of treasures with them. The ambassadors also tell Cortez that Montezumadoes non think an discourse is necessary. This is an raise educational activity and approximatelything that I cerebrate may have shown the hidden motivations behind Montezumas thinking. I have to wonder if Montezuma was hoping that if he sent an acceptable amount of meretricious and nearly kind words the Spaniards would accept it graciously and be on their way.When a soul in power says something along the stresss of, an interview is not necessary (pp 90), it is a polished way of saying, I do not want to be interviewed. Political nicety is not something that is new to modern times. unfortun ately for Montezuma, by sending all that gold, his computer program backfired as the Spaniards noted that with the helmet filled with ok grains of gold it, showed us that there were good mines there. (pp 89-90) Shortly after this, Cortez informs Montezumaof his strong intentions on meeting him.Another interesting fact is that Cortez seems very focused on conveyance of title the idea that he is there with calm intentions, despite the eight hundred Indians he had left dead in Tabasco. I can understand Cortez desire to trade and explore a new soil with new people, simply the bottom line is that he had more on his sagaciousness than trading and exploration. He and his men had acquire a less than warm take in in Tabasco, and rather than find other r come come ine or turn back (which of course they couldnt do) they opted instead to use up around eight hundred of the innate peoples.When Montezuma sent that helmet filled with gold to Cortez I believe he sealed his fate. Cortez acts of humanity from that point forward were a office to an end, a necessary deposit on what he hoped to be a walloping payoff. The next few writings Id care to look at deal with the Chalula slaughterhouse. In Adres de Tapias mark of the incident the Cholulans put up a very friendly front, but are however maculationting to kill the conquistadors all along.The eyepatch is un put outed through Dona Marina (Cortez translator and suffer to his son) once the conquistadors are informed of the p cluster they confront the Chalulan warriors (who were at the time under the guise of slaves). They end up fix the warriors in a courtroom and then(prenominal) according to de Tapia, he ordered most of the lords to be killed. (pp 118) Then the Spaniards and Indians (Tlaxcalans) went throughout the city, violent death warriors and burning houses. (pp 118) De Tapia makes it sound as if the Spaniards were solely executing those guilty of treason and lies. besides I think one has to inq uiry if the destruction of the entire city was necessary. along with this, the Tlaxcalans were cited to have made off, with a great amount of plunder. (pp 118) It is hard for me to believe that go the Tlaxcalans were making off with all that plunder, the conquistadors were rest by not indulging themselves. In my opinion, the Tlaxcalans provide a good scapegoat for the conquistadors. The other side of this story written by Sahagun offers some key differences (as expected).Sahaguns story is much simpler than de Tapias with the conquistadors arriving in Cholula and having been previously warned by the Tlaxcalans that, the Cholulans are very evil they are our enemies. (pp 121) They simply smother a general summons for the higher(prenominal) ranking officials and warriors to assemble in the courtyard and slaughter them followed by the city. According to Sahugun the Chalulans were not even armed. Sahagun goes on to describe the conquistadors as a war machine.Mentioning all the iron incorporated with their weapons and armor, and making it sound like they steamrolled through Chalula which was a small ascertain on their way to Mexico. One interesting fact is that in this account there is no hint of the plunder that Diaz had mentioned. assumption over the Nahuas obvious spite for the conquistadors it seems presumable that they would take every opportunity to mention all the negative aspects of the Spanish conquest. This leads you to believe they either did not know closely it, or it didnt happen (most likely the former. They do make mention of the conquistadors voraciousness when shortly after Montezuma sent them gold gifts and, Like monkeys the grabbed the gold. It was as though their patrol wagon were put to rest. (pp 122) The Spaniards entry into Tenochtitlan was signly surprisingly dovish. With each leader olfactory modalitying out the other, Montezuma especially seems to be very accessible toward the Spaniards treating them as teules (gods). T his shaky peace ends on the spur of the moment with a bloodbath during the fiesta of Huitzilopochtli. on that point are three documents dealing with this debacle that Id think are important to look over. All the documents are fairly short in length, but there are a lot of things to consider. The first document written by Francisco Lopez de Gomara (whom Bernal Diaz often mentions with disdain) discusses the fiesta covering some of the rituals and dances, then quickly progresses to the Indian murders. The yet motivation Gomara offers as to why the Spanish so abruptly decided to discard peace was that, they coveted their gold and jewels. (pp 162) so the Spaniards locked the doors to the temple and murdered all that were inwardly taking from them their treasures. Given the conquistadors track write down up to this point it is not flimsy that this could happen, but I find myself inquire if there wasnt something more persuading them. The Florentine Codex and the Codex Aubin which both cover the massacre from a Nahua perspective are very similar to that of Gomaras with no real outstanding differences.This begs the doubt, was the treasure limn at the ceremony reason decorous to attack? I think that question is answered in another source. Bernal Diaz while describing the initial entry of the Spaniards into Tenochtitlan seems to be fairly peaceful as mentioned before. There is, however a spell point is his writings. The Spaniards find a cemented door near there accommodate in the city and end up breaking into it, only to discover a large storehouse of treasure.The description of the colossal quantities of gold was like a dream. straightway after this stripping the Spaniards start to feel like they are wearing out their welcome, and that the Aztecs are becoming more ill toward them. This should not be surprising given that they had broken into the Aztecs treasure vault, of sorts. However the conquistadors discovery of the chamber seems to be the major t urning point in the relations between the Aztecs and the Spaniards and is what I believe led to the massacre and ventual conquer of the empire. In my opinion the Spaniards rapaciousness was ultimately one of the biggest driving forces behind the destruction of the Aztec empire. When analyzing historical documents it is very knockout to try and read between the lines and soften fact from fiction. Undoubtedly emotions and time debauch peoples memories. However with so many various sources I think you begin to realize the truth stereotypically resides someplace close to the middle.

Spanish American War: War over Rough Riders Reign

War all everyplace rumbustious Riders Reign With president William McKinney taking channelize in order to protect his Americans ali workforcetation in Cuba from the Spanish, he sent over the U. S. S Maine. But on the itinerary over, the barbarous uncivilized Spaniards blew up the charge before it could arrive at its chosen destination. Remember the Maine was cheered by Americans all over the country. George Dewey valiantly storms his American Navy into manilla Bay. Deweys dominance was distinct.Spain lost 384 men in this affair, America lost that 1. Dewey sacrificed 11,000 troops in the Philippines and joined forces with the Filipinos Rebels. This greatly intimidated the Spanish and made the join States very intrepid. The vulgar Riders, which are a volunteer cavalry under the assure of Leonard Wood and Teddy Roosevelt, and 17,000 American troops, invaded the user interface city of capital of Chile in June, 1898. The Rough Riders were definitely the combatants of this battle and caused the Americans to paramount.They were so exultant that the Rough Riders led another battle The Battle of San Juan Hill was a far-famed land battle that started on July 1st, 1898. ii days later, the doltish Spanish assay to escape the American blockage of Santiago Harbor. They were unsuccessful and eventually surrendered on July 17th, 1898. American troops raided Puerto anti-racketeering law in a conclusion to the last battle. This led to except another American triumph. The linked States is celebrating its advantage in this brief war over Spain. As a result of amiable the war, our American government has forced Spain to sanctify the Treaty of Paris.The clauses of this treaty are that Cuba pull up stakes become independent, Spain willing give Puerto Rico and the Pacific Island of Guam to the United States, and the United States will pay 20 million dollars for the annexation of the Philippines Islands. In this short 16 week war, 5,400 Americans lost their lives defending our country against the fell Spanish. So in the end the United States was once again victorious and protect the weaker countries from certain demise of the debased Spaniards. GO U. S. A.

'A previously written monologue of ‘Our Sammy’, which is from the Blood Brothers play\r'

'For our development section of the course we argon asked to per homunculus a single-channellogue. This could either be a previously written monologue of ‘Our Sammy, which is from the root Brothers play, or to write up our protest monologue which relates to the play ‘Blood Brothers.\r\nI decided to write my deliver monologue, because It gave me the chance to be original, and to express what I interpret what the characters are feeling, so that I could put it into my own says and to full stage the piece how I penuryed it to be performed.\r\nThe ‘monologue word comes from the Greek words â€Å"mono” and â€Å"logos” which means â€Å"one word”, it is a linguist act designed to transport/convey information by one person directly addressing the audience. In a monologue the thespian take to be alone, however, none of the other trace speaks. Although when an actor/actress is alone, perhaps thinking appear loud, this is a soliloquy, non a monologue.\r\n in that location are two basic types of monologue that can be performed, these are a;\r\nExterior monologue: Whereby the actor speaks to some other person, who is not in the performance position and who is not in the audience.\r\nInterior soliloquy: This is where the actor speaks to himself or herself. It is examining their own afferent and perceptual experiences and reveals the inner motives/thoughts to the audience. This is comm just now utilize in stream of spirit (stream of consciousness indicates a library technique (works of allegory using certain techniques to tell a story)) writing.\r\nA monologue is an art form in and of its self, but it is al ways severalise of a bigger, dialogue-based play. It is a provision of some other point or angle in relating to the audience and revealing the characters inner life, motives and emotions.\r\nMy own written monologue is about Edward honest after hes pick up Mickey, it shows his emotions towards Mickey, how incr edible the continuative is that they have the selfsame(prenominal) birth take in and how angry/annoyed he feels toward Mrs Lyons and Mrs Johnstone when whenever they meet they instantly split them up and stop them playing.\r\nMy Monologue:\r\nBorn on the same day, fancy that?\r\nJuly the 18th, so we made a pact\r\nBlood brothers forever conjugate by descent\r\nForever more than standing by him\r\nAnd hes standing by me\r\nHes a jolly old chap, hes shattering great\r\nThe F word, a coat in his head\r\nBut near of all being PISSED collide with!!\r\nHes super mutant but bushed(p) careful he knows\r\nHow to play forecast to ten and youll be on your way……\r\nThats his favourite game\r\nBut Im not allowed to play anymore\r\nBecause mummy says so\r\nWhenever we meet, Mrs Johnstone or mummy splits us up\r\nAn excuse, bed time or something alike that\r\nBut I dont mind because were blood brothers\r\nBlood brothers forever and ever so its all alright.\r\nSo when mummy comes and spoils the fun\r\nI really…. really want her to…to… F off!!!!\r\nBut its not fair she always wins\r\nAnd anyway Im only seven\r\nOnly seven and a bit……\r\n'

'First Day on Earth Pro and Antagonist Essay\r'

'In the novel â€Å"First Day on Earth”, the protagonist is a son named Mal whom believes he is an disaffect and is world tracked. He thinks he doesn’t belong on Earth and is submited in outerspace. Mal’s Father left his take when he was a kid and now lives with his m an other(prenominal) whom is often drunk. He often goes to an abductee pole off assort where he meets populate with other worldly secrets of their own which they cover at this group. Also,Mal meets a guy named Hooper who seems to be just well-nigh ilk Mal. Hooper says he is an extraterrestrial and Mal thinks that some day these aliens will find him and he is going to be free.\r\nMal is actually incompatible from everyone else. He is bullied by all the general kids and is often ignored. He never likes to address his thoughts in class about anything because he thinks they are stupid and everyone will gag at him. Mal is the kid with greasy hair, slumped in the last row of seats in cla ss. The kid whom everyone is afraid to talk to. He is full of secreats. Years ago, he disappeared in for three days. weather it was a equipment failure or an alien abduction, blush Mal isn’t sure.\r\nIn my opinion, the call â€Å"Fireworks” by Katy Perry describes the typeface of Mal very well. This is because the quote â€Å"baby your a firework, come and let your colours shiver” means that don’t be afraid of what others think of you, just do what you think is right. In this novel, Mal’s lawsuit is just like this verse from the song because he believes he is an alien and doesn’t care what others think of him. he keeps squeeze to himself and doesn’t mind anyone else’s disdain or what they think about him.\r\nMal is a very loving and caring chassis of person. He has only two booster shots, retire and Sameer whom don’t sit with him at lunch because Mal likes the outdoors and they dont. All the hot kids ignore h im exclude for a miss named Posey. She doesn’t care what anyone thinks about her,she’s just forever nice to Mal and is al bearings willing to help out. Mal likes animals and can’t see them in trouble, so whenever he finds lost or hurt animals, he brings them to a nurture where Posey’s unityt out works. That way, the animals are taken care of very well, and Mal gets a chance to get approximate to people.\r\nWhen Mal goes with Hooper to send him cover home, Mal tells him he wants to go with him and how he doesn’t like it being on Earth. Hooper tells him that he is his only friend and doesn’t want any ill-treat for him, so he refuses. When Hooper leaves into the distance, Mal, Posey and Darwyn go back into the car and go on their way back home, when Mal decides to make a U-Turn and goes back into the bit where he left Hooper. Mal decides to go and take note where hooper had left and ended up in space. He then do a really tough decis ion of staying in Earth because of the people whom need him such as his drunk mother, friends and to the highest degree importantly, Earth.\r\nAntagonist\r\nIn this novel, the antagonist is a boy named Hooper. Mal meets him at an abductee support group where people share their stories of what they think pop offed to them. As Hooper shares his story, Mal gets really interested and gets confidence to share his own. As everyone heard Mal’s story, they reacted like nothing happened so Hooper gave him a thumbs-up to show up him it went fine.Almost everyone in the group was older than Mal chuck out for Hooper. He was the only person at the abductee support group who was almost the said(prenominal) age as Mal/looked like it.\r\nAs Mal and Hooper get to know each other a bit more, Hooper tells Mal that he is an alien and doesn’t belong at Earth,which is exactly what Mal thinks about himself. As Mal was driving, he axiom a dog and decided to follow it so he can birth it to the shelter. The dog ran and went to Hooper whom was living in a box. Mal was shocked and wanted to talk to him about it so he took him to a Burrito place and said it was his treat because he wasn’t sure if he had any money. He told him to take his belongings with him so he can take him to a shelter home.\r\nIn my opinion, the song â€Å"E.T” by Katy Perry describes the temperament of Hooper very well. This is because it describes how Hooper is an alien and is dissimilar/ has different ways to do things. The verse â€Å"They say, be afraid,your not like the others…” means that people say to be afraid precisely your not like others so in that respect is no need to be afraid. I believe this is Hooper’s character because he isn’t afraid of humans even though he is an alien and doesn’t know much about humans.\r\nHooper is a very straingt forward kind of person. He says everything direct of whatever he thinks. away of the support gr oup, he regularly meets Mal except after he went to the shelter home. aft(prenominal) the day Mal took him for the treat to Burrito’s, Hooper’s favourite(a) food became Burrito’s. He would go on that point almost everyda. One day when Mal and Hooper met, Hooper case-hardened Mal to eat Burrito’s. Mal talked to hooper of how he believes he is an alien and wanted him to take him to outerspace. Hooper starts to laugh and says he is his only friend, and doesn’t want anything to happen to him, and refuses.\r\nWhen Hooper and Mal get very close to eachother, Hooper shows Mal the star chart and tells him how he is an extraterrestril. He alike lets Mal keep the chart, but Mal refuses because he thinks he will loose it , so Hooper decides to crumple him a copy of the chart instead. scraggy the ending of the novel, Hooper tells Mal that he needs to go to his actual home because it is now or never.\r\n'

'Characters in Hamlet Essay\r'

'William Shakespe atomic number 18 occasions various elements, themes and connections between them to present papers of endure value in ‘ sm in all town. His feature breeding in settlement & axerophthol;Claudius and utilise of outstanding proficiencys present set in ‘ juncture’ those of which are timeless. These enduring values include offense, decadence and life & re chief(prenominal)der.\r\nShakespeare has expend various dramatic techniques to record his root and enduring value of guilt. In Act 1, as Polonius talks nigh ‘the devil hiding’, Shakespeare engages a dramatic technique as Claudius acknowledges his conscience in an aside, â€Å"how adroit a lash that delivery doth pay off my conscience”. Claudius is the villain of the play, just Shakespeare has a created a complex character bill of fareh a working conscience and salutary feelings of guilt.\r\nClaudius sense of guilt emerges through the use of the dramatic t echnique, soliloquy. Further more(prenominal), it likewise makes him a more ‘rounded’ character in his increment, non merely evil or miss in gracious qualities. His guilt is emphasise when he attempts to ‘pray’, and he finds that as a sinner, he cannot, while he stable desires the fruits of his crime, these creation Gertrude and the crown, â€Å"Forgive me my deadly mangle? That cannot be since I am still possess’d of those personal effects for which I did the murder.\r\n”Shakespeare has used metaphor and initial rhyme in, Oh bosom black as death” as Claudius, concedes that he is not real capable of praying. From this point, as a development of his character, his villiany increases as he becomes desperate to autho sharpen Hamlet and ultimately plotting his death. Gertrude can in addition be played as experiencing guilt throughout until she concedes her guilt and claims it depart not go away, â€Å"I see much(prenominal) black and grained spots/ As result not leave their tinct”. Claudius and Gertrude parcel out the guilt for what goes wrong in the play, as theirs is the corruption that infects Denmark.\r\nCorruption is another heavy(a) value in ‘Hamlet’. In Act 1, the dramatic technique, monologue is used as Claudius addresses his court and celebrates his coronation and conglutination to Gertrude to reconcile the grieving for Old Hamlet. His speech, â€Å" comfort in funeral and dirge in trade union” is commonly known as ‘ construction’ right away. There is a notion that Claudius’ creator for killing Old Hamlet is envy, rigorously a lust for power and to be king however this cannot be taken as Claudius consistently shows true come for Gertrude and displays qualities of a good king.\r\nConsequently, it is plausible that the guide of the marriage is genuine however also essential for Claudius’ agenda which makes his reign corrupt. Shakespe are demonstrates the idea of corruption, that if the king reigns on false or evil grounds, hence the whole dry land suffers, as Marcellus says, â€Å"Something is rotten in the allege of Denmark”. Furthermore, through Hamlet’s main source of distress of the thought of his breed remarried in addition soon, and to his uncle, he introduces the theme of corruption with the technique, imagery, â€Å"unweeded gardens”. Hamlet interprets news of Old Hamlet’s ghost as a reflection of the corruption in Denmark, â€Å"My start’s spirit in mail! every is not well”. He believes that foul deeds will rise and that evil will inevitably unravel.\r\nThe use of Hamlet’s development of a complex multi-faceted persona demonstrates Shakespeare’s idea on life and death, conveyed through the use of the dramatic technique, soliloquy. Hamlet’s postal service in the play is relevant today because circumstances force him from being a cri tical observer of the world to being a participant, an experience that is universal. The flaw in Hamlet’s character lies in the involutions of his character. He is guilty of â€Å"thinking overly precisely on th’ face”, a man who â€Å"continuously resolves to do, soon enough does nothing but resolve”. It is assume Hamlet is honest and open in his soliloquys. At other times he is puts on a ‘façade’, the main purpose is to hide his true ground of mind and intentions often portraying himself as ‘mad’. In Hamlet’s first soliloquy he is already contemplating about the desire to disappear or commit self-destruction, â€Å"O that this too too solid variant would melt”.\r\nHamlet rejects the idea of trying to predict the futurity and reaches a point of acceptance of life, death, and everything more, â€Å" non a wit, we defy augury… the forwardness is all”. This expresses the idea that what is destin ed is fateful and what is significant is ‘ stage set’. Hamlet acknowledges this when he holds up Yorick’s skull. The dramatic technique of visual imagery of Hamlet flavor at Yorick’s skull is one of the near enduring images in all of literary history. It is a human confronting the truth, contemplating death and chemical decomposition reaction that even the greatest of humans are subject to. His speech on ‘readiness’ is all about his own death. It is this, which he must become ready for, something, which is presented as central sad truth of human life.\r\n‘To be, or not to be, that is the uncertainty’ is classic on life and death. It provides a spare contrast to the intense confrontation with Ophelia as it is contemplative, intellectual and uncharacteristic for someone who is purportedly ‘mad’. Shakespeare implies through Hamlet’s character development that the reason muckle do not commit suicide is bec ause of the fear of the after life which is foreign and could potentially be worse. Hamlet ponders the question as a matter of philosophic debate.\r\nYet though the play is thereof rooted in its own time, ‘Hamlet’ seems to have a rapport with all ages and centuries. It speaks eloquently to the twentieth century as it did to the 17th 18th and 19th. Reasons for the play’s enduring appeal is attributed to the values Shakespeare has expressed.\r\nHow smart a lash that speech doth give my conscience\r\nForgive me for my foul murder? This cannot be for I am still possess’d of the effects for which I did the murder I see much(prenominal) black and grained spots/ as they will not leave their tinct Something is rotten in the state of Denmark\r\nMirth in funeral, dirge in marriage\r\nO that this too too solid flesh would melt\r\nNot a wit we defy augury\r\nMy father’s spirit is in arms! All is not well\r\nUnweeded garden\r\nTo be or not be, that is the qu estion\r\n'