Rachel Akhazemea Essay

In the novel of mice and men John Steinbeck uses the two protagonists Lennie lowly and George Milton to memorialise moral philosophy finished-out the novella. Steinbeck uses the main(prenominal) voices to portrait the American romance. I pick up Steinbeck vaguely lives us to explore each character feeling by feeling, notwithstanding in the snip of age theyre living in we get a clearer understanding of why they are the air they are. In this essay I will discuss the blood between twain George and Lennie, and why Steinbeck has decided to use two completely different characters in the same content.A rather key representation in which Steinbeck introduces Lennie and George is through the use of description. In the opening of the novel, Steinbeck decides to cr sweep awaye suspense for the characters. He uses metaphorical language to compare Lennie manage an animal the way a fend for drags his paws, the idea of Steinbeck doing this allows the ingester to assumedly suggest what type of person Lennie is straight away, the imagery of the bear represents how masculine, strong and loud Lennie comes crossways to be, only on the an different(prenominal) hand it could represent how slightlytimes a bear is unaware of its actions and is dangerous, whitherfore this foreshadows what take chancess later on in the novel.Our understanding of Lennie begins to grow as we ascertain further on into the novel. We k straightway Lennie is promisen as a strong character physically and George is a strong character verbally, but not so much physically as Lennie. The relationship may face some challenges as theyre dialect is obviously different, you would assume two coterminous friends would instal unity in the way they come across, but Steinbeck doesnt use this typical idea of friendship in the novel.As we read further on in the book we create an image for twain characters. We start to pee how Lennie treats George as a father figure. Lennie, despite existence slow and easily confused, is sure of this friendship. We see this when Lennie is subjected to answer Crooks joke when he says George might abandon him, Lennie jumps to result George wouldnt do nothing uniform that this proves that as dim-witted as Lennie seems, he will continue to see to it himself and remember that George would never leave because of the value of their relationship, from Lennies point of view, George is the nigh important person in his biography his guardian and only friend. We overly see that Lennie is reluctant and nave but I wouldnt eat none, George Id leave it all for you.You could cover your beans with it and I wouldnt touch none of it the point that Lennie outbursts in apology after George expresses to him his anger, goes to show the extent of earnestness Lennie has for their relationship, the idea that he is willing to sacrifice his liking (being ketchup) but shows how much he truly cares approximately George. We excessively see how much Lennie is dependant of George as he results George Yes Lennie funed his head.No, Lennie. Look take in that location across the river you can almost see the place Lennie obeys George the concomitant that Lennie obeys George quickly shows there is a certain amount of respect for George, it shows he trusts George in whatever is being said, But we can then encompass this in two ways a threatening, cruel way, or just the fact that Lennie understands the level of respect required with George. This also suggests to the endorser that there are barriers in the relationship that affect how they treat each other, when Lennie chooses to obey George it may also show how Lennie cant decide for himself and he necessitate George to make his decisions for him.On the other hand, I have explored the way Lennies and Georges characters may change once they are around other people. We can also link this to the way George treats Lennie, George who is constructed as a obligated father-like man, and the n seen as a reluctant carer to Lennie can be seen as a battle between two personalities in one person.We realise Georges personality changes when he is talking to Lennie and referring to the dream they both partake in Georges voice became deeper. He repeated his words rhythmically as though he had said them many times before. Guys like us work on ranches the fact that Georges voice begins to get deeper as he starts to explain the dream shows how he feels towards it, sweet passionate George begins to reveal itself to the subscriber implying his inte eternal sleep in what hes explaining, and it becomes more than words that he is speaking.But we then realise the contrast when George is talking amongst his work friends, George refers to Lennie as a Crazy bastard his dialect is a complete novelty from when he was explaining the dream passionately. Describing Lennie as a crazy bastard may give the impression to the reader that George pretends he doesnt understand the way Lennie is when he behaves unnecessary, showing how he may pauperism to seem larger than what he really is, in front of his work friends. George finds it hard to show his true love and compassion towards Lennie when around other people.In Chapter deuce-ace George is talking to slim about the past, George explains to him how him and Lennie grew up together as neighbours, George mentions that when he first began travelling with Lennie he found it funny to play pranks on Lennie, but as they grew older they were no longer fun. We realise the relationship comes across barriers and obstacles especially because Lennie had a mental dis capacity. George herd Lennies whimpering cry and revolve about, blubbering like a rape Jesus Christ A freehand guy like you Lennies lip quivered and tears started in his eyes, aw, Lennie George format his hand on Lennies shoulder .I aint fetching it away for meanness, that black eye aint fresh..ect Lennie cries like a baby, his reaction can be compared to a baby w hen they get told off, this may show mental weakness. The main thing about it is seeing a grown man cry, What is also interesting is straightway that George has made Lennie cry, George is considerably s muched up by Lennies tears, Georges quick reply was I aint taking it away jus for meanness this shows George has a passionate side, he doesnt want Lennie to be upset, but he still involve to show some control. We also recognize the quick transition in George as his emotions change from firm to soft, some people might get the picture this is another way, the fact that George switches the way he talks to Lennie so sharp may show he is forced to put on a responsible role, George doesnt want to be mean to Lennie, but Lennies demeanor forces him to.Georges sharp words can sometimes come across threatening to Lennie, his role of having to be responsible and caring towards him can be challenging for George.Into the second chapter as Lennie and George arrive at the camp and eventually go into meet the brag, George is precise keen on being in control. His constant use of language is used to dominate the conversation. Whats your name?George Miltonand yours?George said, His name Lennie small. This shows us that George is carefully thinking about what may happen if he allows Lennie to talk, with full understanding that if Lennie says something out of content, they might loose their fortune of working there. When we come to talk about how others may see the relationship, I find the antiques perceiptive can be very intresting, as the boss is conversating with Small and Milton, the boss starts to suspect that George is using lennie to steal his gold he hacked his thumbs in his belt and squinted one eye nearly closed. evidence what you sellin? huh?I said what stake you got in this guyThe boss get out interprets Georges authority and sees it as a way of George benefiting himself by taking Lennies money. When George knows he uses his authorative role to benefit the m from losing their jobs.Later on in the novella, it is unmixed that George begins to feel fed up with Lennie, having to move locations all the time for every(prenominal) small mistake Lennie does. The fact that George ends ups killing Lennie clearly shows his lack of faith. George comes to a realisation that Lennie can not carry on the journey with him especially when he seems to be limiting him from going anywhere.I believe Steinbeck wants the reader to understand that sometimes you need to do the worst things to get the go around results. He uses these two reluctant characters to portrait a hidden believe between them both, but the hope ends up get crushed once George kills Lennie, which seemed like it was for the best.With a wider insight of what Steinbeck uses the characters for. Ive analysed the way he uses the American dream with Lennie and George to separate them from the rest of the workmen. Lennie and George both share the same dream which keeps their hope through ou t their stay at their workplace. George says with us it aint like that. We got somebody to talk to that gives a damn about us.We dont have so sit in no bar elbow room blowin in our jack jus because we got no place to go, if them other guys gets in incarcerate they can rot for all anybody gives a damn. But not us.. the fact that George separates him and lennie from the other guys shows he sees everyone else differently, it shows they have a different mind-set to the rest of the guys and it shows they believe in something bigger and greater than in the walls of the ranch.Throughout the novel, Lennie seems to be unaware of what is right and what is wrong, and this comes across as a burden on george as he has to correct gim for every wrong thing he does. George knows just how easy his life could be without Lennie and all the confusion he causes. We understand this because at the start of the book George tells Lennie how he would get a decent job with nice guys to talk to and a good pa y. then(prenominal) at the end spend as much as he wanted. Georges life has been made harder because of Lennie, and until Lennie goes, hell forever be unhappy.When George is conversing with the boss, its interesting to see how Lennie can hide his strength which only emphasizes his weakness. The boss seems interested in hearing what Lennie can do, because of his masculinity and size, but now that Lennie has been forbidden to talk by George, he is afraid to communicate The boss pointed a playful finger at Lennie he aint much of a talker, is he? hes sure a hell of a good worker.Strong as a cook The fact that lennie is described as another animal for the 2nd time in this novel re-enforces Steinbecks idea of Lennie, it repeatedly foreshadows his behaviour now and what it could turn out to be, an animal has a lower mind-set than a human, less(prenominal) knowledgeable and less understanding. This episode also highlights how Lennie is weaker than George, Lennies physical build is very d eceiving and he is limited by his mental ability and by his spill subjugation to George.We also realise the different types of features used such as imagery, metaphors and similes to dominate the shot or place. A water snake glided swimmingly up the pool, twisting its periscope head from side to side, and it swam the length of the pool and came to the legs of a motionless heron that stood in the shallow. A silent head and tool lanced down and plucked it out by the head and the beak swallowed the little snake while its tail waved frantically the great imagery here is used to begin section 6 to describe a setting like the Garden of Eden this gives the reader a hint of what the scene may look like, a paradise heaven.The sliding snake represents the invite serpent from the Garden of Eden, this symbolism is used to suggest the predatory temper of the world foreshadowing Lennies quick death. The innocent snake narrated in the reference of the novel is now un- judgely taken from the world and soon Lennies life will be taken from the world just as un expected as the snake. The idea that the snake is classed in a lower form than the Heron shows the difference between George and Lennie, George representing the predator and Lennie as the prey.We can often question ourselves on the way Steinbeck decided to end the book. The ending was sure enough optimistic and interesting and especially un-expected. I believe Steinbeck wanted to get across to the readers that in order to pursue our dreams, we have to get loose of whats stopping us from achieving, and in this case Lennie was topping George. Steinbeck also wants us to realise the amount of determination you need when you desperately want something.A successful way in which Steinbeck ends the novel is in the way he links it to the American Dream. The two protagonists lennie small and george Milton clearly attend structure the hole idea of the American dream and the deep morals that come along side it. The America n dream tells us that everyone is tolerable and everyone has same rights to achieve success, as long as effort is put into it.In this case, Lennie and George would love to persue their dream together, but Lennies mental ability and slow mindset holds them both back from achieving and becoming successful, Steinbeck clearly show this by proving in order to persue your dreams, you need full submission, meaning getting rid of anything that is holding you back, and in this case, Lennie.Another way in which we could grok the way Steinbeck uses the characters to portrait the American dream, is through their characteristics. Pursuing something great requires a lot of determination and a right mind set, it wasnt that Lennie and George had no determination but lennie wasnt in the perfect mind render to pursue the dream, so by George ending Lennies life, it allowed the extra stress to be released of Georges shoulders.Steinbeck simply uses this to show the reality side of things. The idea t hat the dream was reachable, but once George gave up on Lennie the dream became no longer attainable. The American dream was for anyone stable enough to work for what they want and to achieve it, but the purpose of the ending was another way of telling people that having a dream and striving for it is definitely not easy, he also gets us to understand that even though everyone around you may not believe in what you do, it does not mean you should stop believing in it. The main core of this novel was the suspense built between Lennie and George to show having a strong desire for something isnt impossible.